aernet@lists.aerbvi.org

AERNet General Discussion Listserv

View all threads

encourage everyone to comment!

DF
D'Andrea Frances Mary
Thu, Jul 27, 2017 4:07 PM

This story in Education Week  provides an important link to the public comment sites at the US Dept. of Education. If you think “it can’t happen here,” you’re not paying attention to the loud drumbeat to loosen regulations and roll back guidance statements at the department.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/07/27/betsy-devos-needs-to-hear-your-views.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-RM

Children who are visually impaired and blind are “costly” to a school district. If you think that providing quality braille instruction such as that mentioned in the “Dear Colleague” letter from 2013 (see https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf) is so important that it would “never” be rolled back, I’m afraid I don’t share your optimism about the current climate in D.C. We need to say loudly over and over that it’s MORE costly NOT to provide instruction to students in low incidence disability categories, and that providing braille, technology, and high quality educational services— including direct instruction from a certified TVI —is essential to positive outcomes for our students who are visually impaired and blind.

In case the link to the Education Week article doesn’t work, I’m also pasting the link here:
"You can submit comments on both regulations and guidance online https://www.regulations.gov/ (at docket number ED-2017-OS-0074-0001) by the strict deadline of Aug. 21."

I was in D.C. last week, and am alarmed by the things I’m hearing. I’m not posting this from any political perspective; I just know that too many people don’t understand what we do in our field, nor do they understand the importance of the direct instruction from a highly qualified TVI and COMS. Please post a message and encourage the parents of your students to write in, and your students themselves!

Remember, the due date is Aug. 21. Thanks, everyone!
—FM D'Andrea

This story in Education Week provides an important link to the public comment sites at the US Dept. of Education. If you think “it can’t happen here,” you’re not paying attention to the loud drumbeat to loosen regulations and roll back guidance statements at the department. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/07/27/betsy-devos-needs-to-hear-your-views.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-RM Children who are visually impaired and blind are “costly” to a school district. If you think that providing quality braille instruction such as that mentioned in the “Dear Colleague” letter from 2013 (see https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf <https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf>) is so important that it would “never” be rolled back, I’m afraid I don’t share your optimism about the current climate in D.C. We need to say loudly over and over that it’s MORE costly NOT to provide instruction to students in low incidence disability categories, and that providing braille, technology, and high quality educational services— including direct instruction from a certified TVI —is essential to positive outcomes for our students who are visually impaired and blind. In case the link to the Education Week article doesn’t work, I’m also pasting the link here: "You can submit comments on both regulations and guidance online <https://www.regulations.gov/> (at docket number ED-2017-OS-0074-0001) by the strict deadline of Aug. 21." I was in D.C. last week, and am alarmed by the things I’m hearing. I’m not posting this from any political perspective; I just know that too many people don’t understand what we do in our field, nor do they understand the importance of the direct instruction from a highly qualified TVI and COMS. Please post a message and encourage the parents of your students to write in, and your students themselves! Remember, the due date is Aug. 21. Thanks, everyone! —FM D'Andrea
KB
Kathryn Botsford
Thu, Jul 27, 2017 4:24 PM

Thanks FM

Kathryn D Botsford, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
Visually Impaired Learner Program
Portland State University
Portland, Oregon
Email: botsfor2@pdx.edu
&
Executive Director Vision Education Research, LLC
Email: kdbotsford.ver@gmail.com

Cell: 206-849-3021
Sent via my iPhone

On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:07 AM, D'Andrea Frances Mary literacy2@mindspring.com wrote:

This story in Education Week  provides an important link to the public comment sites at the US Dept. of Education. If you think “it can’t happen here,” you’re not paying attention to the loud drumbeat to loosen regulations and roll back guidance statements at the department.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/07/27/betsy-devos-needs-to-hear-your-views.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-RM

Children who are visually impaired and blind are “costly” to a school district. If you think that providing quality braille instruction such as that mentioned in the “Dear Colleague” letter from 2013 (see https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf) is so important that it would “never” be rolled back, I’m afraid I don’t share your optimism about the current climate in D.C. We need to say loudly over and over that it’s MORE costly NOT to provide instruction to students in low incidence disability categories, and that providing braille, technology, and high quality educational services— including direct instruction from a certified TVI —is essential to positive outcomes for our students who are visually impaired and blind.

In case the link to the Education Week article doesn’t work, I’m also pasting the link here:
"You can submit comments on both regulations and guidance online (at docket number ED-2017-OS-0074-0001) by the strict deadline of Aug. 21."

I was in D.C. last week, and am alarmed by the things I’m hearing. I’m not posting this from any political perspective; I just know that too many people don’t understand what we do in our field, nor do they understand the importance of the direct instruction from a highly qualified TVI and COMS. Please post a message and encourage the parents of your students to write in, and your students themselves!

Remember, the due date is Aug. 21. Thanks, everyone!
—FM D'Andrea


PersonnelPrep mailing list
PersonnelPrep@lists.aerbvi.org
http://lists.aerbvi.org/mailman/listinfo/personnelprep_lists.aerbvi.org

Thanks FM Kathryn D Botsford, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Visually Impaired Learner Program Portland State University Portland, Oregon Email: botsfor2@pdx.edu & Executive Director Vision Education Research, LLC Email: kdbotsford.ver@gmail.com Cell: 206-849-3021 Sent via my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:07 AM, D'Andrea Frances Mary <literacy2@mindspring.com> wrote: > > This story in Education Week provides an important link to the public comment sites at the US Dept. of Education. If you think “it can’t happen here,” you’re not paying attention to the loud drumbeat to loosen regulations and roll back guidance statements at the department. > http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/07/27/betsy-devos-needs-to-hear-your-views.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-RM > > Children who are visually impaired and blind are “costly” to a school district. If you think that providing quality braille instruction such as that mentioned in the “Dear Colleague” letter from 2013 (see https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf) is so important that it would “never” be rolled back, I’m afraid I don’t share your optimism about the current climate in D.C. We need to say loudly over and over that it’s MORE costly NOT to provide instruction to students in low incidence disability categories, and that providing braille, technology, and high quality educational services— including direct instruction from a certified TVI —is essential to positive outcomes for our students who are visually impaired and blind. > > In case the link to the Education Week article doesn’t work, I’m also pasting the link here: > "You can submit comments on both regulations and guidance online (at docket number ED-2017-OS-0074-0001) by the strict deadline of Aug. 21." > > I was in D.C. last week, and am alarmed by the things I’m hearing. I’m not posting this from any political perspective; I just know that too many people don’t understand what we do in our field, nor do they understand the importance of the direct instruction from a highly qualified TVI and COMS. Please post a message and encourage the parents of your students to write in, and your students themselves! > > Remember, the due date is Aug. 21. Thanks, everyone! > —FM D'Andrea > _______________________________________ > PersonnelPrep mailing list > PersonnelPrep@lists.aerbvi.org > http://lists.aerbvi.org/mailman/listinfo/personnelprep_lists.aerbvi.org